🔗 Share this article

The world is falling short in the fight against the climate crisis, but it continues engaged in that conflict, the United Nations' climate leader declared in the Brazilian city of Belém following a bitterly contested UN climate conference reached a pact.

Significant Developments from the Climate Summit

Delegates during the climate talks failed to put an end on the dependency on oil and gas, amid fierce resistance from some countries led by Saudi Arabia. Additionally, they fell short on a central goal, forged at a conference held in the Amazon rainforest, to map out a conclusion to deforestation.

However, amid a fractious period worldwide of patriotic fervor, war, and distrust, the discussions avoided breakdown as was feared. Global diplomacy held – barely.

“We knew this Cop was scheduled in stormy political waters,” said the UN’s climate chief, after a long and occasionally angry final plenary at the climate summit. “Refusal, division and international politics has dealt international cooperation some heavy blows this year.”

Yet Cop30 showed that “climate cooperation is alive and kicking”, the official continued, making an oblique reference to the United States, which during the Trump administration chose to refrain from sending a delegation to the host city. The former US leader, who has called the climate crisis a “hoax” and a “con job”, has come to embody the opposition to progress on dealing with dangerous climate change.

“I cannot claim we are prevailing in the battle against climate change. However we are undeniably still engaged, and we are fighting back,” Stiell stated.

“Here in Belém, nations chose cohesion, science and sound economic principles. Recently we have seen significant focus on a particular nation stepping back. But despite the intense political opposition, 194 countries remained resolute in unity – rock-solid in backing of environmental collaboration.”

The climate chief pointed to a specific part of the summit's final text: “The global transition towards low greenhouse gas emissions and environmentally sustainable growth cannot be undone and the direction ahead.” He emphasized: “This is a diplomatic and economic message that must be heeded.”

Talks Overview

The summit began more than a fortnight ago with the leaders’ summit. The Brazilian hosts promised with initial positive outlook that it would conclude as scheduled, however as the discussions went on, the confusion and clear disagreements between parties grew, and the proceedings seemed on the verge of failure by the end of the week. Late-night talks that day, though, and compromise on all sides meant a deal was reached on Saturday. The conference produced decisions on dozens of issues, including a promise to triple adaptation funding to safeguard populations against climate impacts, an agreement for a fair shift framework, and recognition of the rights of Indigenous people.

Nevertheless suggestions to start planning roadmaps to shift from fossil fuels and halt forest destruction were not approved, and were delegated to processes beyond the United Nations to be advanced by alliances of willing nations. The impacts of the agricultural sector – such as livestock in cleared tracts in the rainforest – were largely ignored.

Feedback and Criticism

The overall package was largely seen as minimal progress in the best case, and significantly short than required to address the accelerating environmental emergency. “Cop30 began with a bang of ambition but ended with a sense of letdown,” said a representative from the environmental organization. “This was the opportunity to move from talks to implementation – and it was missed.”

The UN secretary general, António Guterres, said advances were achieved, but cautioned it was becoming more difficult to secure consensus. “Cops are consensus-based – and in a period of geopolitical divides, consensus is ever harder to reach. It would be dishonest to claim that this conference has provided everything that is needed. The disparity from where we are and what science demands remains dangerously wide.”

The European Union's representative for the environment, Wopke Hoekstra, shared the feeling of relief. “The outcome is imperfect, but it is a huge step in the correct path. Europe stood united, advocating for high goals on climate action,” he stated, even though that unity was sorely tested.

Merely achieving a pact was favorable, noted Anna Åberg from Chatham House. “A ‘Cop collapse’ would have been a big and harmful setback at the end of a period already marked by serious challenges for global environmental efforts and international diplomacy more broadly. It is positive that a agreement was reached in the host city, even if numerous observers will – rightly – be disappointed with the level of ambition.”

But there was also deep frustration that, while funding for climate adaptation had been promised, the deadline had been delayed to 2035. Mamadou Ndong Toure from a development organization in Senegal, commented: “Climate resilience cannot be established on reduced pledges; communities on the frontline need predictable, accountable assistance and a definite plan to take action.”

Indigenous Rights and Energy Disputes

Similarly, although the host nation styled Cop30 as the “Conference for Native Peoples” and the deal recognized for the first time native communities' territorial claims and knowledge as a essential environmental answer, there were still concerns that participation was restricted. “Despite being referred to as an Indigenous Cop … it became clear that native groups continue to be excluded from the negotiations,” stated Emil Gualinga of the indigenous community of a region in Ecuador.

And there was frustration that the concluding document had not referred directly to oil and gas. James Dyke from the University of Exeter, observed: “Despite the organizers' utmost attempts, the conference will not even be able to persuade countries to agree to ending fossil fuel use. This regrettable result is the result of short-sighted agendas and cynical politicking.”

Protests and Prospects Ahead

Following a number of years of these yearly UN climate gatherings held in authoritarian-led countries, there were outbreaks of colourful protest in the host city as civil society came back strongly. A major march with tens of thousands of demonstrators energized the midpoint of the conference and activists made their voices heard in an otherwise dull, formal Belém conference centre.

“From Indigenous-led demonstrations at the venue to the over seventy thousand individuals who marched in the streets, there was a palpable sense of progress that I haven’t felt for years,” remarked Jamie Henn from Fossil Free Media.

Ultimately, concluded watchers, a path ahead remains. Prof Michael Grubb from University College London, commented: “The damp squib of an conclusion from the summit has underlined that a focus on the phasing out of fossil fuels is fraught with diplomatic hurdles. For the road to Cop31, the focus must be balanced by equal attention to the benefits – the {huge economic potential|